Friday, November 30, 2012

PARALLELS BETWEEN WAL-MART AND DCF PLANTATION WORKERS

There are oppressed workers fighting in different locations for egalitarian rights. Wal-Mart workers do not receive a decent wage nor insurance benefits. And this in spite of the fact Wal-Mart Inc. is valued at 100 billion dollars. Workers on DCF Plantation by contrast have decent pay and insurance: however, both are oppressed in different ways. Connecticut Juvenile Training School Youth Services Officers (which is a low level position) are abused by a predominately  white hierarchy.Therefore, abuse in two places by people in power over their employees.


================================================================== ================================================================== ================================================================== ===================================================================== ======================================================================

"Civil Rights Activists: Racial Profiling Law Needs Overhaul."


===================================================================
Civil Rights Activists: Racial Profiling Law Needs Overhaul.
by MATTHEW KAUFFMAN on MARCH 5, 2012 · 1 COMMENT
Lawmakers and civil rights groups called Monday for an overhaul of the state’s racial-profiling law, following a Courant report showing black and Hispanic motorists pulled over by police were far more likely to receive a ticket than white drivers stopped for the same offense.
“This data that the Hartford Courant revealed only verifies what we know has been going on for quite some time,” said Imam Mohammad Ansari of the Connecticut chapter of the NAACP. “We’ve been saying for years that this and other types of racial profiling are still going on. This is not new.”
But the analysis of traffic stops, coupled with the Department of Justice’s criminal investigation of alleged discrimination by some officers in East Haven, has sparked renewed calls to strengthen the state’s law on profiling. Speakers at a morning press conference at the Legislative Office Building said the current law has been widely ignored and lacks the teeth to compel police agencies to investigate and root out possible bias.
The Alvin W. Penn Racial Profiling Prohibition Act was passed in 1999 and required police agencies across the state to collect data on traffic stops and submit the reports to the state. But only about a third regularly submit the information, and the Courant’s analysis was the first ever to compare how whites, blacks and Hispanics fared after police stops for specific offenses.
“This important bill that was passed is not being enforced, nobody’s paying any attention to it, and a lot of people are being harmed,” said state Sen. Edwin Gomes, D-Bridgeport, who holds the seat once held by Alvin Penn.
Isaias T. Diaz, chairman of the Latino and Puerto Rican Affairs Commission said he and others would press for legislation that would give the Office of Policy and Management responsibility for collecting and analyzing traffic-stop data. That task is currently the responsibility of the African-American Affairs Commission, which has consistently reported that it lacks the resources to complete an analysis. Diaz said legislation would also establish an advisory committee to review compliance with the law.
State Rep. Kelvin Roldán, D-Hartford, went a step further and said he would support legislation authorizing the appointment of a special master to supervise departments found to be out of compliance with the law.
The Courant analyzed data on more than 100,000 traffic stops and found that for 13 categories of offenses – from speeding to running stop signs to having a broken tail light – Hispanic motorists stopped by police were more likely to receive a citation than whites stopped for the same offense. Black motorists were more likely than whites to be cited in 10 of the 13 categories. Among motorists stopped for running a stop sign, for example, 22 percent of white motorists received a ticket or summons, compared to 28 percent of black drivers and 40 percent of Hispanics.
“This  is not ‘disparity,’ ” said State Rep. Juan Candelaria, D-New Haven. “This is purely discrimination.”
Several Connecticut police officials, however, have said they do not believe officers engage in discriminatory practices and say other factors may lead to higher ticketing rates for blacks and Hispanics. They point out that the data collected during traffic stops identifies only the violation that led to the stop, and say a motorist could be pulled over for a minor violation but receive a ticket for a more serious offense, such as driving without a license. That would skew the data if blacks and Hispanics on average are more likely to be in violation of those more-serious offenses. Others say black and Hispanic drivers may on average have worse driving histories, which could affect whether an officer issues a ticket.
Some speakers said the data may under-report the racial and ethnic disparity in traffic stops. Adam Osmond of Farmington said both he and his wife have been ticketed by local police and identified as white, even though they are both dark-skinned blacks.
“I don’t think anybody in this room could confuse me being white,” Osmond said. “In my opinion, this was done in order to lower the percentage of black people [counted as having been ticketed] and increase the percentage of white people.”
Even before the Courant’s Feb. 26 report, lawmakers were pressing for legislation that would shift responsibility for analyzing the traffic stop data from the African-American Affairs Commission to OPM. A similar proposal failed to come up for a vote last year, but activists Monday said the issue’s higher profile gives them confidence that lawmakers would approve that change, and would be open to a broader overhaul of the law as well.
“I’m not just upset about the fact that we have racial profiling going on, I’m upset about the fact that we’re here this year after attempting to do a fix to this bill last year,” said state Rep. Gary Holder-Winfield, D-New Haven, chair of the legislature’s Black and Puerto Rican Caucus. “There is no one in this building who has any legitimate reason why they would vote against or work against a bill to fix the bill that passed in 1999.”

http://courantblogs.com/investigative-reporting/civil-rights-activists-racial-profiling-law-needs-overhaul/
==============================================================



"Connecticut man's database shines light on high cost of lottery"

Connecticut man's database shines light on high cost of lottery 
Published: Thursday, November 29, 2012
By Joe Amarante, Register Staff jamarante@ctcentral.com / Twitter: @joeammo

Amid the small talk and big lines for the $550 million Powerball drawing Wednesday, a Connecticut voice sounded a warning about the social costs of the lottery, based on his own experience. Former lottery retailer Adam Osmond of Farmington urges dreamers to “keep in mind the dark side of gambling addiction, and the fact that most lottery winnings are very small, and the fact that a small percentage of the people in the state are responsible (for) the majority of the lottery sales — the poor, the minority and compulsive gamblers. ... And a lot of store owners.” Osmond said he got in trouble for his own problem gambling, but won’t talk about that in detail, out of concern for his wife and three daughters. “My store became one of the top (for) store lottery sales in the state, and almost all the sales (were) mine,” he wrote in an email. “All you need to see is my store’s sales before me and after me, and there are many store owners just like me who are still gambling.” Osmond, 45, has created an online database of winners from the past 14 years at www.ctlotterywinners.org based on information he’s been able to collect via Freedom of Information filings. And then he matches data from other sources, such as the IRS, to draw conclusions about lottery players. A long 2009 analysis of gambling effects in the state showed, among other things, a move in popularity from weekly Lotto to Powerball and scratch-off tickets these days. It also reported findings of a survey showing rates of problem gambling “are much higher in the more urbanized counties of Hartford and New Haven.” Connecticut Lottery spokeswoman Linda Tarnowski said, “The Lottery partners with responsible gaming experts on a variety of projects and programs that prevent problem gambling and to educate on available resources for help.” Osmond said he hasn’t gambled in four years and has testified against gambling expansion. He said the data support his points about lottery sellers and the people who gamble most. Lottery officials responded to his requests only after FOI complaints, he said. “It’s huge, huge data. ... Fourteen years of records.” Anyone who hits a lottery ticket for more than $599 has to redeem it at one of four locations statewide, and fill out their information. No street addresses are available, but names, amounts, stores and ZIP codes are public (some of which is also on the lottery website). “But the problem is, they (on the lottery site) only put in the big winners (over $10,000),” he said, “and only the last two years. Mine is searchable by name, ZIP code, by store.” Osmond produced a map of Connecticut lottery winners from 1998 to 2010 that shows more winners per 100 residents in urban areas, where incomes are lower. His analysis shows 65 percent of lottery winners (and by inference, players in general) are below the state’s median income. “The poorest ZIP codes are the highest players,” he said. Today, Osmond is an accountant who also sells accounting software for gas stations and convenience stores. He said when the lottery jackpot “gets this high, everybody plays. But most people who play (normaly) are either minority poor or people addicted to gambling. You’ll see the names repeated a lot in that database.” And those folks probably aren’t winning as much as they bet. “Everybody thinks they’re going to win $500 million. But most of the winnings are very small, and those people, they spend a lot of money to get to that.” He has advice for anyone who thinks they might have a problem. “Get help. ... This (gambling) is one of the secrets that you’ll keep quiet. It’s not like any other addiction where you have signs. People with alcohol, you can smell it on them, drugs you can see. But gambling has no signs. It’s a hidden addiction.” 


http://www.nhregister.com/articles/2012/11/28/news/doc50b6e8e79b205587687708.txt


http://blogs.courant.com/rick_green/2011/11/who-won-the-lottery-now-you-ca.html

=====================================================================
Click the link below for more information.







Friday, November 16, 2012

DCF: SO YOU WANT TO BE NUMBER ONE?

According to a large data we received from Commission of Human Rights and Opportunities (CHRO). We did an analysis to see how State agencies rank discrimination complaints filed against them. In the spread sheet below, State agencies that have more than one thousand employees, DCF ranks # 7 (between 2009-2011). Once we obtain data for 2012 and years prior to 2009, maybe DCF will rank #1.


Thursday, November 15, 2012

NORTHEND WOMEN TALK ABOUT DCF PLANTATION

At the Unity Plaza Post Office in the Northend of Hartford women talked about their displeasure with the DCF Plantation foster child system. These women reported how DCF workers treat people of color in unacceptable ways,compared to potential white foster parents in suburbia. The women talked about the following things: (1) how DCF workers want to give families of color certain children with severe cognitive issues, while white foster parents do not receive the same types (limited cognitively etc), (2) DCF uses financial cudgels (short thick sticks) to convince people of color to accept "certain types" of children. One woman explained how a DCF worker said "if you do not take this child, monies ill be reduced when you accept another one", (3) these women also described how negative labels e.g. "uncooperative, difficult to deal with" etc are placed on them for simply asking questions about treatment plans for kids placed in their homes, (4) homes in suburbia with white foster parents are offered more financial assistance than parents in communities of color. It was all this writer could do to end the conversations with these women; their anger over perceived ill treatment by DCF was palpable, and this they say is typical of treatment in Hartford's Northend by DCF.
In the final analysis it appears as if the complaints about the DCF Plantation is not just isolated to a few malcontents. With organizing by activists among DCF foster parents of color, it is hoped that video footage of their stories will be posted soon.

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

A WITCH HUNT BEGINS ON THE DCF PLANTATION

There is currently a selective process going on at Connecticut Juvenile Training School to stop egalitarian rights from being obtained by Youth Services Officers.We must first of all understand how for years a culture of injustice, bias,corruption, nepotism and racism has been encouraged and flourished at CJTS. Those in power have made sure no winds of meaningful change have blown to inspire the oppressed employees from accessing power. Now employees have glimpsed something which raised their level of consciousness; CJTS management is going after a few select employees and using policy and procedure adherence as a righteous cover. Why is this happening now? To be honest the answer lies in the fact that CJTS is seeking to expand,bringing in more incarcerated youth, thus receiving more state and federal dollars. It is necessary therefore to make sure the new facility at CJTS is conditioned i.e. no troublemakers spoil appearances of tranquility. Historically oppressors seek to keep a serene appearance on horrific occurrences: deception is a key element on the DCF Plantation,"now you see it,now you don't." Also, in the past three years, activists within CJTS and other DCF sites went on the offensive in exposing nefarious practices of management which entails (1.) selective consequences for favored YSOs when investigated for infractions such as hitting a resident, (2.) allowing Caucasian employees to receive mild consequences and people of color to receive draconian punishment, (3.) to allow a Caucasian Unit Leader to take time off from work (through manipulation of work scheduling). So now management institutes a witch hunt on the CJTS Plantation to serve as an object lesson for those employees with a vision for human rights: the thinking is not original but predictable, scare those employees who think of activism by punishing certain troublesome YSOs.

Monday, November 12, 2012

ARISTOTLE'S WORDS APPLIED TO THE DCF PLANTATION STRUGGLE

Aristotle a Greek philosopher 384-322 B.C. said "men who are themselves dishonored. And see others , obtaining honors rise in rebellion." You might ask how these words from antiquity can apply to the struggles employees face on the DCF Plantation. Let us look at the words of Aristotle individually.

1. Men> can be translated people ( DCF Plantation employees) that are dishonored. And we find on the DCF Plantation there are plenty of people (employees) suffering injustice due to endemic bias within a state agency.

2. Others> can be viewed as the DCF administrators or their minions in positions of power. Aristotle mentions how people see corrupt officials obtaining honors,  possibly in the form of unearned DCF promotions, maybe some DCF officials received federal assistance after storm Irene using false documentation, at the DCF site (Connecticut Juvenile Training School)  maybe management has started a witch hunt against employees considered problematic (using policy and procedure of course to justify their actions).

3. Dishonored> might be viewed as employees being rejected due to standing up for egalitarian-workers- rights, or maybe people with different sexual orientations are seen as persona non grata, could mean embrassing employees publicly with draconian penalties for minor infractions while some-management favorites- get away with outrageous policy infractions ("can the weather be this bad" for example).

4.Rise> might be considered as employees of DCF Plantation developing a social consciousness, it can mean standing up to DCF administrators at CJTS as they go after certain employees with harsh penalties- in order to cow others into submission.

5. Rebellion> means exposing how the DCF Plantation is biased and  run by whites for 30 years,this word rebellion also means letting management know via protests-lawsuits- petitions-media interviews that employees are fighting their oppression.
Yes, the words of Aristotle can be applied to DCF Plantation struggle.

Saturday, November 10, 2012

More Misleading the Public. "Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics"

"DCF spokesman Gary Kleeblatt said…  more than 45 percent of DCF's staff are minorities...." 
Gary Kleeblatt has made a statement that DCF's staff is diversified and has 45%minorities. We posted data to show how top level management in every unit of DCF ,including the executive office are Caucasians. There are very few minorities in the plantation hierarchy. Is Kleeblatt color blind? I wonder when Kleeblatt meets with management does he see diversity or just a winter white out? No pun intended to Mr. Kleeblatt, we understand he is just a spokesperson for the DCF Plantation.
 

DCF Organizational Chart as of Oct 2011, still shows that the plantation is run by whites and disregards placing people of color in positions of power.


According to this organizational chart 76% of the DCF Plantation is composed of whites, and only 24% are minorities. That is a lot different than the media spin by DCF publicity person Kleblatt's statements.

The chart below depicts how the DCF Plantation is top heavy with 70% females in positions of power, while 30% of males eke into the hierarchy. There are only four minority males in the entire DCF Plantation that are in the hierarchy, two black and two Hispanic. These numbers do not reflect the population that DCF serves (which is overwhelmingly minorities)


Tuesday, November 6, 2012

CONTROL OF CONTENT & PROCESS

There is a war raging on the DCF Plantation. When any issue of discrimination or race is broached by people of color a battle takes place to control content and process. By content I mean 'what is said' by people of color to the administrators on the DCF Plantation. The process is defined as'a vehicle to analyze what is said' by people talking about bias or racism. Those people in power at the DCF Plantation [elite] seeks to control content/control, and in effect, limiting effectiveness of the oppressed to achieve justice for grievances.
We all know by controlling both, the elite can/will shapes any image of injustice as something else i.e. "disgruntled employees, this is not really racism, or it is all a misunderstanding."

Friday, November 2, 2012

DCF FISCAL UNIT: FISCAL REWARDS ON DCF PLANTATION ARE GREATER FOR WHITE EMPLOYEES.

 Chart one shows that only one employee of color is above the position of Fiscal Administrative Officer or Accountant

Chart two shows only one employee of color earns above $60,000 to $69,999 range.